Skip to content

Scratch · /dev · not for production

Method explorables — POCs

Proofs-of-concept for the methodology section. Each sits on its own route and works at 375 px. Real interactions with real inputs — no fake animations. Citations visible on each page. Open each, try it on a phone and a laptop, decide whether the interaction earns its place.

Built against the existing design tokens: ink, cream, forest; Lora + Inter; weights 400 and 500 only; opacity and weight for state differences, never a new colour.

Wave 1

My top three picks from the V2 menu.

C21 · Missing legs fail in predictable ways

The scope diagnostic

Five questions about a specific engagement — yours, one you have been pitched, one you are considering. Output is a coverage map, not a verdict.

Open the POC →

Wave 2

The next three. Together, they make the structural-rarity argument from three different angles.

C15 · Three-part method is rare — career economics

Why there are so few generalists

Twenty-five years of a consulting career on a slider. Depth and breadth move in opposite directions, and the slope explains the industry shape.

Open the POC →

C19 · What lives in the gap between specialties

The handoff graveyard

A strategy deck and a fundraiser’s inbox. Send one to the other and watch which attributes survive the trip.

Open the POC →

C20 · Missing legs fail in predictable ways — at the organizational level

One-way doors

A budget slider that can be dragged down and dragged back up. The asymmetry between the two motions is the argument.

Open the POC →

Wave 3

Two more on the listening-at-scale argument: how the question protocol shapes what the engagement can produce, and how much each interview actually costs to use.

C16 · Listening at scale — what it actually costs

One hour in, seven hours out

Estimate the total project hours behind one sixty-minute interview. The decomposition explains why listening at scale is rare.

Open the POC →

Revisions

The two redesigns from METHOD_CONCEPTS_REVISED.md. C06 replaces the original "where consultants stop" range bar with a coverage grid. C09 absorbs the original C09 (triangle toggle) and C10 (NMCAA counterfactual), both of which named specific clients, into a single composite-signature exercise that names none.

C06 · Three-part method is rare — the industry-shape view

Where firms plant their flags

A coverage grid across consulting archetypes. The empty cells are the argument. Tap any row to see why that flag sits where it does.

Open the POC →

C09 · Missing legs fail in predictable ways — pattern recognition

Three failures, three fingerprints

Three deliverables described. Match each to which leg was missing from the engagement that produced it. The reveal teaches a transferable diagnostic skill.

Open the POC →

Ten POCs total — eight from the V2 menu plus two revisions. C17 (funder concentration) and C18 (coalition half-life) still pend a decision on the data problems flagged in BUILD_PLAN.md.