C13 · proof of concept
Four question types, four kinds of insight.
An interview is not a neutral container. The kinds of questions on the protocol determine what the engagement is even capable of surfacing — and the four types below produce four different kinds of material. The decision about what to ask is the upstream decision; everything else is execution. Try the sort below, then read what each bin reliably produces.
0 of 8 placed
-
"How did you come into this work?"
-
"Walk me through what happened last Tuesday."
-
"Who in this sector do you trust to tell you when you’re wrong?"
-
"What would you have to stop doing if your largest funder left tomorrow?"
-
"What’s the moment you remember thinking this work mattered?"
-
"What’s the smallest part of your job that takes the longest?"
-
"When was the last time your organization and another in the sector disagreed publicly?"
-
"What’s the quietest way your sector is failing?"
What you got
0 of 8 placed correctly.
What each bin reliably produces
- Biographical
- Surfaces the personal narrative — how the interviewee came into the work, what shaped their commitment, what they remember as the formative moments.
- Operational
- Surfaces how the work actually runs — friction points, hidden costs, the gap between the official process and the real one.
- Relational
- Surfaces the trust network — who is read by whom, where conflict has happened, which alliances are real and which are formal.
- Structural
- Surfaces the conditions the work depends on — dependencies, fault lines, what would change if a load-bearing variable changed.
Joint-initiative thinking — the kind of finding that can become a recommendation a sector can actually fund and act on — surfaces disproportionately in structural questions. A protocol heavy on biographical and operational questions feels humane and rich. It will not, on its own, produce many joint initiatives.
Most stakeholder-interview protocols are heavy on biographical and operational questions. They produce material that is genuinely useful — the consultant comes away with a thick understanding of how the work runs and who the people are. They do not produce many recommendations a funder can fund.
Adding two or three structural questions to the protocol — questions about dependencies, fault lines, counterfactuals — changes the kind of finding the engagement can produce. This is one of the smaller decisions in the design of a listening exercise, and one of the more determinative.