Skip to content

C19 · proof of concept

The handoff graveyard.

Most consulting work is priced to stop at a handoff. A strategy consultant delivers a deck and steps back; a fundraising consultant arrives later and starts from what was delivered. The thing that fundability requires — a sized program, a specific ask, a named funder — is supposed to make it across that handoff. In practice, those attributes are rarely in either side's scope, and they do not survive the trip.

Interactive demonstration. A strategy deck contains five attributes. Sending it to the fundraiser shows which attributes survive the handoff and which are lost. Reset returns the inbox to empty.

Strategy deck · what was produced

  • Named stakeholders
  • Workstream architecture
  • Sized programs
  • Specific asks per program
  • A named funder pipeline

Fundraiser's inbox · what arrived

Nothing has arrived yet.

  • Named stakeholders
  • Workstream architecture
  • Sized programs
  • Specific asks per program
  • A named funder pipeline

Two of the five attributes arrived intact. Three faded — because they were never in the strategy engagement's scope, and the fundraising engagement that picks up next is not paid to retroactively produce them. The work that translates a strategy into a fundable proposition lives, structurally, between two engagements that are both priced not to do it. This is the handoff graveyard. Most large nonprofit strategies that die on a shelf die here.

A three-part engagement that holds listening, design, and resourcing together does not fix this by adding more talent. It fixes it by absorbing the translation back into the scope, so the deliverable that leaves the engagement is one a funder can fund without a second consulting engagement to translate it.

Source. Structural observation about how scopes of work intersect, not an empirical claim. The five attributes named here are the standard fundability checklist for major-gift and foundation proposals, drawn from CFRE-track campaign practice. The framing of the gap as a "graveyard" — work that no party is paid to do — is the central failure mode this site argues for foreclosing by scope, not by goodwill.